BOSTON (By Shari Roan,
LATimes) August 22, 2006 Baby fat, that term conjuring up images of chunky
thighs and thickly padded cheeks, is beginning to carry a new connotation.
At a time of so much focus on obesity, the word is that even cute, blubbery
babies can be too fat for their own good.
That's the carefully crafted message emerging from several health groups,
including the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and the American Academy of Pediatrics.
No one suggests that children younger than 2 should be placed on a diet, but
health experts are becoming more convinced that future weight problems can
take root in the earliest days of life and that baby weight should be
monitored in a more rigorous and thoughtful manner.
In particular, health experts are debating the growth charts used to track
weight and height in children, with some organizations such as the WHO
advocating new charts that may be more likely to spot excessive growth in
babies, and the federal government discussing whether to update its growth
charts and add an "obese" category to describe the heaviest children.
"Children don't become obese overnight. It's a process," says Dr. Cutberto
Garza, provost at Boston College and coauthor of a 2004 WHO study on child
growth. "An incredible proportion of our children are getting to
kindergarten overweight, and many of us think the earlier we're able to
identify a child at risk, and do it in a way that doesn't stigmatize, the
better."
There is little doubt that American babies are getting bigger. Several
studies have already charted increases in the rates of overweight children
ages 2 and older. Last month, a survey of children ages 0 to 2 showed the
number of babies considered overweight or at risk for becoming so has
increased dramatically since 1980.
The study, published in the journal Obesity, examined records of more than
120,000 children at an HMO in Massachusetts between 1980 and 2001. It found
that 5.9% of babies ages 0 to 5.9 months were overweight in 2001 a 73.5%
increase from 1980. An additional 11.1% were at risk of becoming overweight.
Among children ages 6 to 11.9 months, 9% were overweight in 2001 a 20%
increase and 14.4% were at risk for becoming so.
Babies are considered overweight if they have a score linking weight to
height that is greater than 95% of all babies. Babies classified as at risk
for becoming overweight fall between the 85th to 95th percentiles.
Yet predicting what will happen to these babies in the future is difficult.
As all parents know, some chubby babies and toddlers shed their extra
padding and become normal-weight children and teens. Others do not.
The earliest days of life may be especially important in setting a child up
for svelteness or plumpness, scientists are finding. Early feeding patterns
may program a child's metabolism or other aspects of body physiology to
increase the chance of becoming overweight.
For example, a study published last year in the British Medical Journal
found that big babies and babies who grow quickly in the first two years of
life had a ninefold greater risk of obesity in childhood, adolescence and
adulthood.
"It appears as though these early weeks to months may be a critical period,"
says Dr. Matthew Gillman, an associate professor of ambulatory care and
prevention at Harvard Medical School and lead author of the recent U.S.
survey on infant weight. "It may be that weight gain in this time of life is
somehow more harmful."
Animal studies are yielding some clues as to how this might happen. A study
presented in June at the American Diabetes Assn.'s annual meeting found that
chronic overfeeding in infant rats increased levels of a hormone known as
leptin during infancy. Leptin is involved in the regulation of appetite and
its levels in the body are thought to be an important contributor in the
development of obesity.
Various recent studies also suggest that a woman's weight before pregnancy,
her nutrition and weight gain during pregnancy, and the early weeks of
infant feeding may exert long-term influence on child growth.
"In adults, obesity is better understood. You eat too much, and you slow
down, you gain weight and become obese," says Kevin L. Grove, a
developmental neurobiologist at Oregon National Primate Research Center and
Oregon Health & Science University, and author of the leptin study. "But
that doesn't explain as much what happens to children. I really feel there
might be a much earlier cause or underlying risk."
Progress by the charts
As these data trickle in, doctors are paying more attention to the
infant growth charts that are used in pediatricians' offices from coast to
coast.
But there is debate on how useful these charts are, as well as which charts
to use.
Earlier this year, the WHO released new child growth charts that differ
significantly from the CDC charts used by most U.S. doctors. They are based
on a WHO study tracking 8,000 children in six countries from birth to age 5.
All the children were breastfed for the first year of life and came from
healthy homes. The study found that, regardless of ethnicity, all of the
children grew very similarly up to age 5.
The new WHO charts are based on this "optimal growth" curve. The CDC charts,
in contrast, show how an individual child compares with the average American
child regardless of whether this "average" rate of growth is healthy or
not.
The WHO charts are designed to be more scientific, says Garza. "We should
not define how children grow, but how children should grow," he says.
Some U.S. doctors wonder if the WHO charts are relevant. They note that the
charts are based on breastfed babies, who tend to be leaner. Fewer than 40%
of U.S. babies are exclusively breastfed for six months.
Perhaps because of this, the WHO curve differs significantly from the CDC
charts and categorizes more American babies as overweight. For example, the
average 1-year-old female baby on the CDC chart weighs just less than 21
pounds. The optimal 1-year-old girl on the WHO chart weighs 19.8 pounds.
That difference may be significant. Studies show breastfed babies tend to
have a lower risk of obesity later in life. But scientists don't know if
that is due to the nutritional content of breast milk or because mothers who
breastfeed tend to be more educated, wealthy and less likely to be
overweight. And breastfeeding alone, experts say, is unlikely to save a
child from packing on pounds.
"I don't think breastfeeding is the be-all and end-all," says Dr. Joseph F.
Hagan, a clinical professor of pediatrics at the University of Vermont
School of Medicine. "It's very easy for television watching and fast food to
undo all the benefits of breastfeeding."
This summer, the CDC, the American Academy of Pediatrics and other health
organizations began a series of meetings to discuss the value of the WHO
charts and whether to make changes to the CDC charts.
Rethinking feeding
If confusion over charts weren't enough, no one knows quite what to do
about babies with high body mass indexes. The new WHO growth charts are not
a call to "put kids on diets or take draconian measures," says Garza. And
it's traditionally been difficult for doctors to address fears that a baby
is gaining too much weight, says Dr. Hillary L. Burdette, an assistant
professor of pediatrics at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
"Feeding is your way of nurturing your infant," she says. "It's primarily
what you do in the first year of life. It's a hard place to tread."
But parents themselves are keenly aware of the nation's obesity problem, she
says. She recently conducted a study that found mothers have an accurate
idea of when their babies may become overweight. The study, published in the
Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, found that infants whose
mothers had the highest level of concern had the greatest fat mass at age 5.
Experts say that pediatricians and parents need to discuss infant and baby
feeding practices during well-baby checkups. Babies should not be put on
diets, but some subtle changes can be recommended, such as switching to 1%
milk instead of whole milk in babies 1 year or older and introducing only
healthful solid foods.
If parents or other siblings are overweight, extra caution should be taken
with the baby's growth, says Dr. Francine Kaufman, director of the center
for diabetes and endocrinology at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles. If a
family eats a lot of fast food, for example, the baby may be offered a
French fry or sip of soda from a sibling or parent's lunch.
"The baby is going to like it. From then on, when the baby sees it, the baby
gets it," she says.
The baby years, however, may be the easiest time to divert a child on the
road to obesity.
"At my age, if I'm overweight, I have no choice but to lose it," Hagan
notes. "In a child, they don't need to lose it. They need to stop growing so
fast."
The kids aren't all right
A new study has found evidence that the nation's rise in obesity rates is
creeping into the youngest age groups.
Percentage of overweight babies
(Babies with a weight-for-height index greater than the 95th percentile.)
0-5.9 months
1980: 1.4%
2000: 5.9%
6-11.9 months
1980: 7.5%
2000: 9.0%
1-1.9 years
1980: 10.3%
2000: 12.3%
2-2.9 years
1980: 5.4%
2000: 10.6%
Source: Obesity, July 2006
